Does the postseason really exist? As
a Mets, Jets and Islanders fan, it doesn’t seem likely, but rumor has it
baseball is still being played, Peyton Manning has one more Super Bowl in him,
and the Boston Bruins will NOT win the Atlantic Division. As I sit, simultaneously
heartened by headlines like “Islanders
improve to 2-0 for first time in 7 years” (NY Post) and haunted by replays
of Butt Fumbles past,
I’m forced to question why athletes fail to perform to their full potential.
For the sake of argument, let’s
chalk Jets’ losses up to choking and not a lack of talent, coaching or general
management (indulge me). The concept of choking has been around since at least the
1980s when Roy Baumeister proposed
a model for decreased performance under pressure. Since then, psychologists,
neurologists and the like have asked why competent people falter in clutch
moments, giving rise to two
general mechanisms that create “the choke”:
1. High stress
situations that require planning for optimal outcomes decrease the capacity of
our long-term (working) memory, lessening our ability to process situations (Otto 2013).
2. Under pressure, neurons
on the left side of the brain involved in analytical thinking fire more
frequently than those on the right that control motor skill. As a result, we “overthink”
and try to assert conscious control over automatic actions. In these moments, muscle
control is lost—a phenomena called focal dystonia or more commonly “the yips” (Linder et al. 2007).
Despite these studies, there is still no clear explanation for
why some athletes perform in the clutch, while others flail.
One justification may be that stress has an upside. Stress
releases dopamine, a chemical signal, into the prefrontal cortex (front of the
brain). Dopamine helps control pleasure and reward centers, and a boost is a
good thing; but stress can cause dopamine to flood the prefrontal cortex and
disrupt proper function. Some people have enzymes that remove dopamine from the
area faster than others. In high stress, high dopamine volume situations, this
proves an advantage; on average, however, those with slow-acting enzymes are
shown to have higher I.Q.’s (Bronson
and Merryman 2013).
Perhaps the NFL will add enzyme analysis to their Wonderlic Test assessment? Or maybe we’re
in for a whole new realm of doping? Either way, It’s Tough Bein’ a New York
Jets Fan.